Note · 06 · Water
The Chocolate River
On water, nakedness, childhood shame and the body crossing from fear into desire.
‘After Andrei Tarkovsky: time is not explained. It is felt through water, silence, skin and return.’
The river arrived first as sound.
I did not see it at once.
We were riding in darkness. Rafael was behind me on the horse, holding the reins from both sides of my body. His chest touched my neck. His skin carried the day: heat, work, sweat, dust, horse, tobacco, night. He had woken me without explanation. A hand on my shoulder. A hush. A finger pointing toward my mouth, telling me not to speak.
At the end of the road, the horse was waiting.
I did not know where we were going.
That was part of the invitation.
In some journeys, the destination explains itself too early. This one did not. We left quietly, passing from the small village into the hills, from public life into another register of time. There was no camera in my hand, but everything was already becoming image: the road, the animal's breath, Rafael's hands, the dark, my own body held between trust and alarm.
I could smell him.
This is always where language fails first.
The body remembers through smell before it agrees to think. Smell has no distance. It does not remain polite. It enters. It crosses borders that vision can pretend to respect.
Then the sound of water rose from below the trail.
Rafael jumped down first. He did not hesitate. He removed his clothes quickly, without ceremony, as if the night, the river and the body belonged to the same law. Then he entered the darkness of the water and howled with pleasure at the cold.
I watched.
There is always a moment before crossing. A tiny courtroom inside the body. Fear presents its evidence. Desire presents its own. The mind invents crocodiles, snakes, danger, disease, humiliation, foolishness. The body asks another question: will you enter?
I removed my clothes and placed them beside his.
Then I jumped.
The cold took me before thought could.
Water does not behave like a photograph. It refuses the frame. It touches every surface at once. It erases outline and makes the body feel newly drawn. In water, the body is not posed. It is held. It is carried, resisted, surrounded.
The river made the night physical.
Above us, the stars were bright. Around us, the village had disappeared. There was no football field, no old woman, no broken car, no police station, no father, no port, no army. Only water, skin, breath and the strange permission of darkness.
But of course, nothing disappears completely.
The past waits for the body to relax before it returns.
As a young boy, I had once joined my father at the port. His workmates amused themselves with fire hoses, water games, male noise, shirts off, laughter, sweat, rough affection, the masculine theatre of men who could turn even play into a test. I had once enjoyed it. I had once removed my clothes freely, before shame had learned where to stand.
Then, just before my Bar Mitzvah, I refused.
Someone sprayed me from behind while I was fully clothed. The men laughed. They expected the old game to continue. They expected me to surrender my body to the ritual. But something had changed. I could no longer enter the joke. I could no longer remove my clothes under their gaze. That was the last time I joined my father at the port.
A line had been drawn there.
Not on the ground.
On the body.
In the river with Rafael, the same line returned, but it did not hold.
That is why the night stayed with me.
The river did not heal anything. I do not trust healing as a word. It is too clean, too final. What happened was more fragile. A memory that had carried humiliation found itself placed beside another experience: the same nakedness, another man, another water, another gaze, another night.
The two scenes did not cancel one another. They touched.
This is where memory becomes cinematic. Not because it moves in a straight line, but because one image can be cut against another and create a third meaning. The port and the river. The father's world and Rafael's world. Shame and desire. Public laughter and private silence. Clothing forced on the body and clothing freely removed.
Chris Marker understood that memory is not recovered in order. It is assembled through association, through return, through images that appear to belong to different countries but secretly speak to one another. In my own work, the cut is not always visible. Sometimes it happens inside the body.
Rafael in the river cut to the port. The port cut back to Rafael. Cuba cut to Israel. Water cut to skin. Skin cut to shame. Shame cut to desire.
This is why I think of Cuba, Love Story not simply as a travelogue, but as a sequence of mirrors. Each mirror was placed in a foreign landscape, but each one reflected something older than the journey.
The chocolate river was one of those mirrors.
By day, we returned there with others. Friends from nearby villages, men on horseback, laughter, showing off, afternoon heat. Rafael stood on the horse, twirled a lasso, climbed trees, shook fruit from branches, teased danger as if danger were another spectator to impress. The masculinity around him was open, playful, excessive, staged. It should have frightened me.
Sometimes it did.
But sometimes it comforted me.
This is the contradiction I keep returning to. As a child, I hated certain masculine gestures. The noise, the hunger, the pride, the body displayed as law. As an adult, some of those same gestures returned as attraction. Not because the fear disappeared, but because desire entered the same room.
The river allowed both.
It was innocent and not innocent. Natural and theatrical. Tender and dangerous. Private and already becoming archive.
Susan Sontag wrote about the camera as a form of possession. I know this danger. I know that to remember Rafael is also to frame him. To write him is to make him carry meanings he may never have agreed to carry. The artist takes from life and then spends years trying to justify the theft.
But perhaps there is another kind of looking too.
A looking that does not claim to own the body, but admits that the body has changed the one who looked.
Rafael changed the meaning of the river. He changed the meaning of nakedness. He changed the meaning of the port.
He did not know he was doing this. That is why it was powerful. He did not perform memory for me. He simply entered the water, and memory followed him.
Roland Barthes speaks to me most clearly when the image wounds through one detail. Not the whole scene. One point. One small unavoidable puncture. In this memory, the punctum is not only Rafael's naked body entering the dark water. It is the moment before I removed my clothes. The hesitation. The split second in which childhood shame and adult desire stood facing each other.
That moment is the photograph I do not have.
The unseen image. The missing frame.
Much of my archive is made from such images. Things I photographed. Things I failed to photograph. Things I could never photograph because they happened inside me faster than the camera could arrive.
A photograph would have made the river visible. It would not have shown the crossing.
A moving image would have shown my body entering the water. It would not have shown why the movement mattered.
This is why the Reminiscence Narrative needs stillness and movement, text and silence, evidence and absence. The image alone cannot carry the whole event. The word alone cannot return the body. The archive must remain incomplete so that memory can continue moving through it.
André Bazin understood the image as a defence against disappearance. But the river taught me that some things survive precisely because they were not fixed. They remain fluid. Unstable. Rewritten each time I return.
The chocolate river was brown by day, almost invisible by night. Its name was childish and sensual at the same time. It belonged to village life, to heat, to the animals, to the trail, to the body after work. It was not a symbolic river when I entered it. It became symbolic only later, when the archive began its work.
John Berger wrote that what we see is shaped by what we know. But sometimes what we see changes what we know.
I saw Rafael enter the water. I followed. And the boy who had once refused the port returned differently.
Not triumphant. Not healed. Different.
That is enough.
There are moments in life that do not announce themselves as turning points because they are too quiet, too physical, too private. A hand on the shoulder. A horse at the end of a road. A body behind yours. A river below the trail. Clothes placed beside another man's clothes. The decision to trust.
The archive returns to these moments because they do not finish.
They remain wet.
They continue to reflect.
The next morning, dogs barked, chickens scattered, and Maria stood above me with a glass of milk. The sun was too bright. The village was tiny. Rafael had already gone to work on his uncle's farm. I was told he had checked on me while I slept.
This small tenderness stayed with me almost as strongly as the river.
He had looked in on me.
Nothing more.
No declaration.
No explanation.
Only the quiet evidence that the night had not belonged to me alone.
The river did not wash childhood away. It gave the body another memory to place beside it.
Connected to this note
- Related stillcuba-love-story →
- Related movingMoving image archive →
- Related bookBooks and publications →
- Related printLimited edition prints →
- Related archive noteArchive →